J. Reuben Clark

You are currently browsing articles tagged J. Reuben Clark.

Lay up grain for seven years was mentioned in a talk given by Heber C. Kimball in 1857. A number of years ago, Gordon B. Hinckley1 spoke to the general body of the priesthood and told us:

Now, brethren, I should like to talk to the older men, hoping that there will be some lesson for the younger men as well. I wish to speak to you about temporal matters. As a backdrop for what I wish to say, I read to you a few verses from the 41st chapter of Genesis.

Pharaoh, the ruler of Egypt, dreamed dreams which greatly troubled him. The wise men of his court could not give an interpretation. Joseph was then brought before him:

Joseph, the Butler and the Baker by Alexander Ivanov “Pharaoh said unto Joseph, In my dream, behold, I stood upon the bank of the river: And, behold, there came up out of the river seven kine, fatfleshed and well favoured; and they fed in a meadow: And, behold, seven other kine came up after them, poor and very ill favoured and leanfleshed . . . . And the lean and the ill favoured kine did eat up the first seven fat kine: . . . And I saw in my dream … seven ears came up in one stalk, full and good: And, behold, seven ears, withered, thin, and blasted with the east wind, sprung up after them: And the thin ears devoured the seven good ears: . . . And Joseph said unto Pharaoh . . . God hath shewed Pharaoh what he is about to do. The seven good kine are seven years; and the seven good ears are seven years: the dream is one . . . What God is about to do he sheweth unto Pharaoh. Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine . . . . And God will shortly bring it to pass” (Genesis 41:17–20, 22–26, 28–30, 32).

Now, brethren, I want to make it very clear that I am not prophesying, that I am not predicting years of famine in the future. But I am suggesting that the time has come to get our houses in order. So many of our people are living on the very edge of their incomes. In fact, some are living on borrowings.

We have witnessed in recent weeks wide and fearsome swings in the markets of the world. The economy is a fragile thing. A stumble in the economy in Jakarta or Moscow can immediately affect the entire world. It can eventually reach down to each of us as individuals. There is a portent of stormy weather ahead to which we had better give heed. I hope with all my heart that we shall never slip into a depression.2

Following his talk, I decided to go back in time as far as I could in this dispensation to find references to Pharaoh’s dream of seven years of plenty (grain) and seven years of famine. The following is an excerpt of Heber C. Kimball’s3 talk on this subject, one of the earliest talks I could find.

Will you be slack, brethren, and let the evil come upon us, when we forewarn you of the future events that are coming? Now, supposing that I had not the spirit of prophecy upon me, then I had better sit down. If a man gets up here and lets the Spirit of God dictate him, he cannot help prophesying, for the Holy Ghost is the Spirit of prophecy, and he will foretell future events, and you cannot help it. We are telling of what the prophets have said–of what the Lord has said to Joseph. Wake up, now, wake up, O Israel, and lay up your grain and your stores. I tell you that there is trouble coming upon the world. They have a pretty good drouth in some places this year. I do not know whether brother Amasa has told you, but almost everything is burnt up in Southern California. They have got to live there and get bread, and probably will be glad to take a handcart.

A wheat field with blue sky background Is it so in the United States? It is. They have got to eat that dish; and when famine, pestilence, and starvation come upon us in a small degree, it will increase upon them fourfold, packed down and running over, and they cannot help it. Let them exult. There never was such a prejudice existing against this people as there is at this day. The Devil is stirring them up because we have commenced that Temple; and we will build it, and they cannot help themselves; and we will lay up the grain for seven years, and thousands of them will worship us for a little johnny cake, and I will live to see it: so will you. And when you see it, you will then have knowledge, won’t you?4

A few years later, I came across J. Reuben Clark’s reference to Pharaoh’s dream and began to see more clearly the divine wisdom in the counsel to lay up grain for seven years (see Pharaoh’s Dream - A Modern Interpretation). Perhaps this is all just preparation for those events spoken of concerning the redemption of Zion.

What are your thoughts on this subject?

Sources:

  1. Gordon B. Hinckley served as the 15th President and prophet, seer and revelator of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints from March 12, 1995 until his death on January 27, 2008, at the age of 97.
  2. Hinckley, Gordon B. “To the Boys and to the Men.” 3 October 1998. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 1 December 2008.
  3. President Heber C. Kimball served as one of the original members of the Quorum of Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. He served as a counselor to Brigham Young in the First Presidency from 1847 until his death in 1868. Of the original Twelve Apostles, only Brigham Young and Heber C. Kimball did not “lift their heels” against the Prophet Joseph Smith. See for example, D&C 121:16; cf. John 13:18.
  4. Kimball, Heber C. Journal of Discourses. 4:338-339.

Wolves in sheep’s clothing was a topic of J. Reuben Clark’s conference talk in April 1949. These wolves - or false prophets - in sheep’s clothing wear the habiliments of the priesthood, but in fact seek the destruction of the Church. He said:

Wolf in Sheep's Clothing Now, our enemies are seeking to attack and are attacking our Church. Time does not permit me to read all the scriptures that I have here, telling of the things that are to come in the last days. But I might call your attention to the fact that the Savior in the Sermon on the Mount said,

“Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” (Matthew 7:15.)

To the people on this hemisphere he made the self-same statement. I also call your attention to the words of Paul in his farewell to the elders of Ephesus. He said,

“For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them.” (Acts 20:29-30.)

I would like to read what Paul said to Timothy, but time forbids. But I will read what Moroni said to Mormon. I might read just one paragraph of the latter. It is the thirty-second verse in the eighth chapter of Mormon:

“Yea, it shall come in a day when there shall be churches built up that shall say: Come unto me, and for your money you shall be forgiven of your sins.” (Mormon 8:32.)

The ravening wolves are amongst us, from our own membership, and they, more than any others, are clothed in sheep’s clothing, because they wear the habiliments of the priesthood; they are they to whom Brother Widtsoe referred, as distorting the truth. We should be careful of them, and I endorse every word that Brother Widtsoe said, as to the obligations of those who instruct the youth.1

Ezra Taft Benson reiterated this teaching:

The Lord distinguishes between the Church and its members. He said He was well pleased with the restored Church, speaking collectively, but not individually (D&C 1:30). During His ministry on earth, the Lord spoke of the gospel net drawing in fish. The good fish, He said, were gathered into vessels, while the bad were cast away. (See Matthew 13:47-50.)

It is important to realize that while the Church is made up of mortals, no mortal is the Church. Judas, for a period of time, was a member of the Church—in fact, one of its Apostles—but the Church was not Judas.

Sometimes we hear someone refer to a division in the Church. In reality, the Church is not divided. It simply means that there are some who, for the time being at least, are members of the Church but not in harmony with it. These people have a temporary membership and influence in the Church; but unless they repent, they will be missing when the final membership records are recorded. (God, Family, Country, pp. 253-54.)

Six of the original Twelve Apostles selected by Joseph Smith were excommunicated. The Three Witnesses to the Book of Mormon left the Church. Three of Joseph Smith’s counselors fell—one even helped plot his death. A natural question that might arise would be that if the Lord knew in advance that these men would fall, as He undoubtedly did, why did He have His prophet call them to such high office? The answer is: to fill the Lord’s purposes. For even the Master followed the will of the Father by selecting Judas. (Title of Liberty, p. 217.)

The Lord strengthened the faith of the early Apostles by pointing out Judas as a traitor, even before this Apostle had completed his iniquitous work (see Matthew 26:23-25; Luke 13:21-26). So also in our day the Lord has told us of the tares within the wheat that will eventually be hewn down when they are fully ripe. But until they are hewn down, they will be with us, amongst us. (See D&C 86:6-7.) (CR April 1969, Improvement Era 72 [June 1969]: 42.)

Yes, within the Church today there are tares among the wheat and wolves within the flock. As President J. Reuben Clark, Jr., stated: “The ravening wolves are amongst us, from our own membership, and they, more than any others, are clothed in sheep’s clothing because they wear the habiliments of the priesthood. We should be careful of them.” (CR April 1949, p. 163.) The wolves amongst our flock are more numerous and devious today than when President Clark made this statement.2

Sources:

  1. Clark, J. Reuben. Conference Report. April 1949. 162-163.
  2. Benson, Ezra Taft. Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson. Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988. 88-89.

Latter-day Saints have long adhered to the separation of church and state. Each has a unique function to fulfill in society. This policy was reiterated at the April 1942 general conference of the Church. President J. Reuben Clark read a message by the First Presidency which included the following:

Constantine's Conversion by RubensThe Church stands for the separation of church and state. The church has no civil political functions. As the church may not assume the functions of the state, so the state may not assume the functions of the church. The church is responsible for and must carry on the work of the Lord, directing the conduct of its members, one towards the other, as followers of the lowly Christ, not forgetting the humble, the poor and needy, and those in distress, leading them all to righteous living and a spiritual life that shall bring them to salvation, exaltation, and eternal progression in wisdom, knowledge, understanding, and power. . . . The state is responsible for the civil control of its citizens or subjects, for their political welfare, and for the carrying forward of political policies, domestic and foreign, of the body politic. For these policies, their success or failure, the state is alone responsible, and it must carry its burdens. All these matters involve and directly affect Church members because they are part of the body politic, and members must give allegiance to their sovereign and render it loyal service when called thereto. But the Church itself, as such, has no responsibility for these policies, as to which it has no means of doing more than urging its members fully to render that loyalty to their country and to free institutions which the loftiest patriotism calls for. Nevertheless, as a correlative of the principle of separation of the church and the state, themselves, there is an obligation running from every citizen or subject to the state.1

President Clark went on to quote Article of Faith 12 and the guiding principles which the Church has consistently adhered to throughout its existence.

What concerns me today is something President Clark warned about over 60 years ago, namely, the State overstepping its appointed role and taking upon itself the role of the Church. In 1945, he wrote:

We must have in mind a skeleton of the facts that make up our problem even if they shall concern themselves with what we are now terming politics. Because today government has touched our daily lives so intimately in all their relationships, and all these governmental touchings have been so tabbed as political, that we cannot discuss anything relating to our material welfare and existence without laying ourselves liable to the charge that we are talking politics. Yet, where any matter touched by the State has to do with our spiritual welfare, our religion, the Church (meaning all churches) not only may, but must be concerned. For as the Church may not interfere with the State, so the State may not interfere with the Church, subject to certain limitations.2

What do you think?

Sources:

  1. Clark, James R., ed. Messages of the First Presidency. Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965. 6:155-156.
  2. Clark, J. Reuben. Church News. 16 June 1945.

In today’s political climate, it is hard to find people who believe their duty transcends party allegiance. Many seem to give their allegiance to one party or another, but at what cost? In 1942, J. Reuben Clark thought it paramount to give allegiance to the Constitution over and above party affiliation. He said:

Democrat and Republican Party LogosNow, I am not caring today, for myself, anything at all about a political Party tag. So far as I am concerned, I want to know what the man stands for. I want to know if he believes in the Constitution; if he believes in its free institutions; if he believes in its liberties, its freedom. I want to know if he believes in the Bill of Rights. I want to know if he believes in the separation of sovereign power into the three great divisions: the Legislative, the Judicial, the Executive. I want to know if he believes in the mutual independence of these, the one from the other. When I find out these things, then I know who it is who should receive my support, and I care not what his party tag is, because, brethren, if we are to live as a Church, and progress, and have the right to worship as we are worshipping here today, we must have the great guarantees that are set up by our Constitution. There is no other way in which we can secure these guarantees. You may look at the systems all over the world where the principles of our Constitution are not controlling and in force, and you will find there dictatorship, tyranny, oppression, and, in the last analysis, slavery . . . . Today, our duty transcends party allegiance; our duty today is allegiance to the Constitution as it was given to us by the Lord.1

Sources:

  1. Clark, J. Reuben. Conference Report. October 1942: 59.

Destructive Forces

J. Reuben Clark once warned about destructive forces seeking to overturn the Constitution and their potential effects on government and LDS Church leadership:

Wall Street during the Panic of 1884 by Schell and LoganI suppose that all of you love your country, love the Constitution, love the free institutions under which we live, love our freedoms. But if there be any, may I ask you, prayerfully and humbly, think this thing over, because if it comes here it will probably come in its full vigor and there will be a lot of vacant places among those who guide and direct, not only this government, but also this Church of ours.1

Sources:

  1. Clark, J. Reuben. Conference Report. April 1952: 80.

Moved by the Holy Ghost

The apostle Peter taught, “For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost” (2 Peter 1:21). How then can we know if a man is speaking by the Holy Ghost? J. Reuben Clark taught:

Apostle Peter Kneeling by Rijn van RembrandtWe can tell when the speakers are moved upon by the Holy Ghost only when we, ourselves, are moved upon by the Holy Ghost. In a way, this completely shifts the responsibility from them to us to determine when they so speak. . . . the Church will know by the testimony of the Holy Ghost in the body of the members, whether the brethren in voicing their views are moved upon by the Holy Ghost; and in due time that knowledge will be made manifest.1

Sources:

  1. Clark, J. Reuben. Church News. 31 July 1954.

Certain groups within America seek to enslave citizens by portraying a fervid, but false solicitude for the unfortunate over whom they seek control. Read by President J. Reuben Clark, Jr. at the final session of the 112th Annual Conference, Monday, April 6, 1942, the First Presidency of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints wrote in part:

Constitution of the United States of America QuillWe again warn our people in America of the constantly increasing threat against our inspired Constitution and our free institutions set up under it. The same political tenets and philosophies that have brought war and terror in other parts of the world are at work amongst us in America. The proponents thereof are seeking to undermine our own form of government and to set up instead one of the forms of dictatorship now flourishing in other lands. These revolutionists are using a technique that is as old as the human race — a fervid but false solicitude for the unfortunate over whom they thus gain mastery, and then enslave them. They suit their approaches to the particular group they seek to deceive . . . Latter-day Saints cannot be true to their faith and lend aid, encouragement, or sympathy to any of these false philosophies. They will prove snares to their feet.1

Sources:

  1. Clark, James R. Messages of the First Presidency. 6:151.

Pharaoh’s dream of seven years of plenty and seven years of famine (see Genesis 41) was given a modern interpretation by J. Reuben Clark. In January 1945, some seven months before the Japanese surrender that signaled the end of WWII, President Clark gave a speech entitled “Some Elements of Post-War American Life” and said, in part:

Joseph Interpreting Pharaho's Dream - Reginald ArthurWe shall come into postwar America in substantial part . . . regimented for a . . . State and Government which deifies the State and makes of men its slaves. We have gone a long distance down this trail, too . . . .  The fundamentals of this technique are as old, certainly, as Joseph, who was sold into Egypt. For he, acting for Pharaoh, first purchased from the people with the taxes extorted from the people, all the grain produced by the people; then when the famine came Joseph sold this grain back to the people, in the first year for all the cash they had, which he turned over to Pharaoh; in the second year for all the flocks and herds they owned, which all went to Pharaoh; next, for all their lands, which he turned over to Pharaoh and finally, he gave them grain in exchange for their bodies and they became “servants unto Pharaoh”. The enslavement of the people was complete, Joseph saying to them, “Behold, I have bought you this day and your land for Pharaoh,” (Genesis 47:23) and thereafter Joseph moved the people as he willed, and they rented back their lands on the terms he prescribed. There is more than one lesson in Egypt’s seven years of plenty and seven years of famine.1

Sources:

  1. Newquist, Jerreld L., comp. Prophets, Principles and National Survival. Salt Lake City: Publishers Press, 1964. 323-324.