Antony C. Sutton

You are currently browsing articles tagged Antony C. Sutton.

Hugh W. Nibley spoke about the controversial German conglomerate I.G. Farben with his son Alex Nibley in Sergeant Nibley PhD, a book about the elder’s experience in World War II. Interessen-Gemeinschaft Farbenindustrie AG earned much-needed foreign exchange to help finance the Nazi war machine, helped build and maintain Auschwitz for the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, or Nazi party of Germany, and held ties with key U.S. counterparts before and during the war including the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Chase Manhattan, Standard Oil, Du Pont, Dow Chemical, and Ford Motor Company.

Sergeant Nibley PhD Apparently as the war neared an end, a few friends of Sergeant Nibley went looking for a place to hold an NCO club in Heidelberg. While searching for a suitable location among many fraternity houses they came upon Germania House, a frat house that had concealed records linking the U.S. corporation Standard Oil to Germany’s I.G. Farben. Here is what Alex Nibley wrote about his father’s experience:

I ended up in Heidelberg at the headquarters for General Dever and the 6th Army Group. That’s where all the fancy people were, and they kept giving each other medals every Thursday and this, that, and the other. General Devers liked comfort, and he wanted everybody to be comfortable. We enjoyed ourselves in Heidelberg. This was the center of German education, and when I had been a missionary in that region I had seriously considered returning to go to school in Heidelberg. Also, the city had not been touched by the war and stood all intact. The first thing after we got there, some old friends of mine from Ritchie went to look for a good respectable frat house for the non-coms, because we wanted our own club. Heidelberg is of course where the tradition of university fraternities reached its zenith and the city was full of wonderful mansions used by the fraternities, so our guys went to this very elegant one, the Germania House. I wasn’t there, but they told me about it. They said, “We went up and knocked on the door and a butler in full-dress livery – everything but a powdered wig – came to the door and looked at us in surprise and said, ‘Well, you people were here yesterday. We don’t have any of the records any more. They’re all gone.’

“What records? What happened? we said.

“Well, they had these big trucks, and we took all the records out and put them in the trucks and they took them away.’

“We said, ‘What records?’

“Your Standard Oil records. We had all your Standard Oil Company records here,’ the butler said.”

It seems there was an agreement that we wouldn’t bomb Heidelberg if they wouldn’t bomb Oxford, so they had all the Standard Oil records there in Heidelberg. Of course, Standard Oil had been hand-in-glove with the German Bayer concern that was famous for making aspirin but also made a lot of other things. Joseph Borkin wrote a book about that, The Crime and Punishment of I. G. Farben. They built Auschwitz, for example, and they were so bad that the SS – mind you, the SS! – pleaded with them to let up on the poor prisoners because they couldn’t produce unless they got something to eat, and there were just dying like flies. When I first went on my mission in the late twenties, I was sent to Ludwigshafen for the first few months, and everybody there was talking about the greatest explosion in German history that had taken place at the Oppau factory, the I. G. Farben factory at Ludwigshafen, this sordid industrial town.

At this time the Germans were very restricted in what military materials they could produce, and they were supposed to be producing fertilizer in this plant, but they’d been making high explosives. They took us through the factory and showed us the processes that the chemicals would go through, and at the end out comes ammonium nitrate for fertilizer, and they had these little bags of fertilizer they were filling. But of course ammonium nitrate can also be used for explosives, so a little trickle of fertilizer would flow from this huge factory, but everybody knew that what they were doing was making munitions. And I. G. Farben was hand-in-glove with Standard Oil. The companies were in partnership, and they protected each others’ patents and they exchanged their knowledge and formulas during the war. Bayer aspirin, Hoechst, BASF – they’re still among the biggest corporations in the world, and they were all parts of I. G. Farben. And all this was going on, and we’d bumbled onto it in Heidelberg. The place we were trying to get for an NCO club was full of Standard Oil records.1

The importance of I.G. Farben to the Nazi war effort was underscored by a team of civilian and military experts who concluded after the war:

Without I.G.’s immense productive facilities, its far-reaching research, varied technical experience and overall concentration of economic power, Germany would not have been in a position to start its aggressive war in September 1939.2

Joseph Borkin wrote about the partnership between I.G. Farben and the Nazi party concerning Auschwitz:

The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben by Joseph Borkin The depth of the partnership was reached at Auschwitz, the extermination center, where four million human beings were destroyed in accordance with the “Final Solution of the Jewish Question,” Hitler’s plan to destroy an entire people. Drawn by the almost limitless reservoir of death camp labor, I.G. chose to build a great industrial complex at Auschwitz for the production of synthetic rubber and oil. So enormous was this installation that it used as much electricity as did the entire city of Berlin. More than 25,000 camp inmates paid with their lives to construct it.3

Continue reading Read the rest of this entry »

  1. Nibley, Hugh and Alex Nibley. Sergeant Nibley, PhD: Memories of an Unlikely Screaming Eagle. Salt Lake City: Shadow Mountain, 2006. 258-260.
  2. Borkin, Joseph. “Introduction”. The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben. Biblioteca Pléyades. 11 January 2008.
  3. Ibid.

Hegelian Dialectic

Last month, I mentioned that the debate over Proposition 8 in California reminded me of Hegelian dialectic.1 But what is this strange sounding concept?

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel by Jakob SchlesingerHegelian dialectic is named after Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, a German idealist who lived between 1770 and 1831. Dialectic is a method of persuasive argument and a form of logic.

Hegel believed that the “State is absolutely rational . . . . and has supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the State.”2 In other words, Hegel was a statist who believed the individual existed for the state – a view contrary to the vision of the Founding Fathers of the United States.

According to Wikipedia:

Hegelian dialectic, usually presented a threefold manner, was stated by Heinrich Moritz Chalybäus as comprising three dialectical stages of development: a thesis, giving rise to its reaction, an antithesis which contradicts or negates the thesis, and the tension between the two being resolved by means of a synthesis. This model is named after Hegel but he himself never used such a formulation and denounced such ways of thinking.3

A visual diagram of this process can be seen at The Calverton School’s The Hegelian Dialectic. Basically, Hegel believed that history unfolds as a thesis is countered by an antithesis. Through persuasive argument, a synthesis is created which becomes a new thesis, countered by – you guessed it – an antithesis. This process continues until an “absolute idea” is created for which an antithesis cannot be formulated. Thus, society continues to progress toward’s Hegel’s ideal state. Continue reading Read the rest of this entry »

  1. See Proposition 8 – The Best Gift Video. See also Nibley on the Redistribution of Wealth as another, albeit limited, example.
  2. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Philosophy of Right. Trans. S. W. Dyde. Kitchener, Ontario: Batoche Books, 2001. For a PDF of this book, see Philosophy of Right at McMaster University. 22 November 2008.
  3. “Hegelian Dialectic”. Wikipedia. 22 November 2008.

Skull and Bones

Skull and Bones is an “elite secret society based at Yale University, in New Haven, Connecticut.”1 The society was formed in 1832, apparently as a result of a dispute over the Phi Beta Kappa awards among Yale’s debating societies.

Skull and Bones Bonesmen The Skull & Bones society is also the subject of Antony C. Sutton’s America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of the Skull & Bones.2

When I first became aware of this book, I was already familiar with Mr. Sutton’s work – specifically Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development: 1917 – 1930.3 So I immediately wondered, who was this seemingly enigmatic man who was by all accounts a staid economics professor and how did he go from researching western technology aid to Russia to writing about the Order of Skull and Bones? That seemed like quite a leap.

But after reading many interviews and excerpts on Sutton’s work, about the West’s technology transfer to communist Russia and what happened to him as a result of that research, I started to understand the progression of his research and his subsequent books.4 It seemed apparent he was looking for the group of people who destroyed his career while at Stanford’s Hoover Institution.

The following are a series of video interviews with Dr. Sutton in which he discusses the history of the Skull and Bones society and how he became aware of the group.

YouTube Preview Image

In this second video, Dr. Sutton discusses how members of the society use Hegelian dialectic to incite conflict, “make [social] progress”, and to prepare society to “take orders from the State.”

YouTube Preview Image

In this third video on the Skull and Bones society, Dr. Sutton discusses how members of the order mold U.S. foreign policy and created war and revolution – “managed conflict” – in countries such as Russia and Germany.

YouTube Preview Image

In this fourth video on the Skull and Bones society, Dr. Sutton elaborates how Hegelian dialectic is used in foreign policy to create and manage conflict. One of the purposes of the order is to create political power that is used to bring about a new world order or “one world” using Hegelian techniques in the creation of conflict. In this scenario, individuals become cogs in the state with no individual rights – a principle espoused by the German idealist Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

YouTube Preview Image

The following Fox News video on Skull and Bones with author Kris Milligan aired in June 2004.

For more information about Skull and Bones, see the transcript of Morley Safer’s review of Skull and Bones at 60 Minutes or Alexandra Robbins’ web site Skull & Bones Society.

Sources:

  1. Skull and Bones“. Wikipedia. 7 November 2008.
  2. Sutton, Antony C. America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of the Skull & Bones. Walterville, Oregon: Trine Day, 2002. Lulu has a free PDF at America’s Secret Establishment – The Order of Skull and Bones. 7 November 2008. See also Scribd at America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of the Skull & Bones. 7 November 2008.
  3. Sutton, Antony C. Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development. Three volumes. Stanford: Stanford University – Hoover Institution Press, 1973.
  4. See “Antony C. Sutton – In Memoriam“. Antony Sutton. 19 November 2008; and “The Works of Antony C. Sutton“. Antony Sutton. 19 November 2008.