End the Fed

The New American, the self-proclaimed “essential news source for freedom-loving Americans”, recently reviewed Congressman Ron Paul’s book End the Fed. According to the report,

We_Can_Do_ItThe . . . eleven-term congressman from Texas has spent a long political career promoting liberty and limited constitutional government as the American Founders understood them and exposing the mischief at the Federal Reserve. With the unexpected success of his presidential campaign and his recent best-selling manifesto on liberty, Dr. Paul’s uncompromising, consistent, and thoroughly principled stances on limited, constitutionally legitimate government are well known around the world. Now, thanks to End the Fed, his views on paper money, fractional-reserve banking, and the Federal Reserve and its manipulation of the money supply are summarized for a mass readership.1

In the book, Congressman Paul states:

Everyone should have an intense interest in what money is and how it’s manipulated by the few at the expense of the many. Money is crucial for survival. It is necessary for maintaining a free society. A healthy economy depends on it. Limiting political power is impossible without it. Sound money is essential for preventing unnecessary wars. Prosperity and peace in the long run are impossible without it. To understand money, one absolutely must understand what a central bank is all about.

George Q. Cannon pointed out long ago, “Gold and silver should both be upheld and used, and any attempt to deprive either of these metals of its value as a tender in payment of debts seems to me a clear violation of the spirit of the Constitution.”2 Since the Federal Reserve essentially operates on “government-printed paper fiat currency”3,

. . . the Fed, with its power to destroy the dollar and fund the operations of government by other means than up-front taxation, is, like all modern central banks, a fundamentally dishonest and immoral institution. The Founding Fathers understood very well the evils of paper money, and while granting Congress the authority in the Constitution to “coin [not print!] money,” forbade the states from making “anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts.” Entries in the journals of the Continental Congress observed that “paper currency . . . is multiplied beyond the rules of good policy. No truth being more evident, than that where the quantity of money . . . exceeds what is useful as a medium of commerce, its comparative value must be proportionately reduced.” . . . “Members of Congress, when they knowingly endorse this system of fraud because of the benefits they receive, commit an immoral act. Financing spending in an irresponsible manner, through Fed action or future debt burdens, provides immediate political benefits to politicians.”

But all of this would come to an end if the people themselves held their political leadership to a higher moral standard. Americans have become accustomed to a government that promises them security and benefits instead of merely protecting their freedoms and enforcing their contracts. End the Fed is a plea to Americans to educate themselves about money and free-market economics — and then demand an end to the system that has systematically devalued the dollar and held ordinary Americans in thrall for several generations. If we do not soon abolish the Federal Reserve and return to sound money, we will likely experience national insolvency and an end to our dwindling political liberties.

Sources:

  1. Scaliger, Charles. “A Review of ‘End the Fed’ by Ron Paul”. 14 Sep 2009. New American. 14 Sep 2009.
  2. Gold and Silver Coin as Tender in Payment.
  3. Monetary and Economic Freedom.

Tags: Constitution, Federal Reserve, Money, Ron Paul

  1. Except that the idea of the gold (or silver) standard is both absurd in the modern economy and just as unfounded and flimsy as a paper standard. What inherent value does gold have? It’s a pretty and malleable metal, but its actual uses are limited. Essentially, to trust it as the basis of your currency, you have to exhibit faith that it has a (non-obvious) inherent value.

    Under the current system, you have to have faith that the U.S. government will continue. And frankly, if the government collapses, it doesn’t matter how much gold you have; I imagine we’ll be on a food-and-water standard.

  2. Sam – It’s absurd only if you believe in Keynesian economics to the detriment of laissez-faire (Strachey on Keynesian Economics), the central planning and control of monetary policy, the continuing development of welfare states, defrauding citizens through monetary inflation, expanding the military-industrial complex leading to perpetual warfare, and maintaining monopoly power for a few via a central bank. These effects are all well documented in Murray Rothbard’s What Has Government Done to Our Money?. This is the “current system”.

    Ludwig von Mises pointed out that the business cycle results from central-bank generated loose money and cheap credit, and that the cycle can only be made worse by intervention in The Causes of the Economic Crisis. Although his essays were written before and after the Great Depression, isn’t the present economic situation similar?

    Interesting that China urges citizens to buy gold, silver.

  3. Greg,
    We were on the gold standard when the Great Depression hit. It is no panacea. Further, the Fed was put in place so that the currency and the economy wasn’t put into upheaval every two to four years. An agency that was responsible to the government but that wasn’t the government was given control over our money in order to prevent it being used for political gains. While it is a bit of an ad hoc solution, I don’t think it is the worst thing ever. Please also remember that the economy that the founding fathers were planning for was primarily agricultural, with relatively low entry fees and little need for financing. The industrial revolution changed both the kind of economy we had and the amount of money that we could make. Using the elastic clause to adapt to vast changes in the economy with the intent of promoting general welfare seems like a good approach if done cautiously (and a constitutional one). Paul is a reactionary, calling for a return to a golden fiscal age that never was.

  4. Sam B,

    I have an ounce of gold and an ounce of paper, which would you choose? If I extended this choice to all Americans, how many would choose the paper?

    I do agree that when the collapse happens that goods and necessities will be the predominate currency, at least at the beginning.

    John C,

    The Federal Reserve was also in power during the Great Depression. In fact, Ben Bernanke stated, “Regarding the Great Depression. You’re right, we did it. We’re very sorry.”

    Sorry? If you are so damn sorry then why did you do it again, and again, and again…..

    Then again, how could it be a bad thing to put a few families with no accountability in charge of our money. I’m sure they would only act in the best interest of we, the people.

    “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.” Mayer Amschel Rothschild

    “The few who understand the system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests.” The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863.

    “I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can and do create money. And they who control the credit of the nation direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hand the destiny of the people.” Reginald McKenna, as Chairman of the Midland Bank, addressing stockholders in 1924.

    “It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and money system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.” Henry Ford

    It’s coming!

  5. Here’s a link to a CNBC article on Ron Paul’s new book “End the Fed”:

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/32881898

  6. Thanks for the quotes Brent. Many are unaware of the statements and actions of those who had a vested interest in creating the Federal Reserve.

    John C., you raise important points. Since I had planned a follow-up post to this one about the Fed, I hope you don’t mind if I incorporate my thoughts into the follow-up. Thanks.

  7. Interestingly, we are about to put these ideas to the supreme test. Bernanke and Geithner are about to hurl us into oblivion with their Keynesian notions. The disinformation about the causes and effects of the earlier depressions works only to perpetuate the power of central bankers who have done a rather effective job of concealing the truth in plain sight.

  8. Gold is money, paper is a money substitute. The FDIC has about $13billion in reserve to cover over $4200billion in deposits. The federal reserve printing press is cranking up to more than double and triple to current money supply. What do you think happens when too many dollars chase too few goods? We are a nation of consumers, not producers. Those who produce wealth get wealthier, those who consume it eventually will go appetite over tin cup.

  9. “What inherent value does gold have?”

    Scarcity – Politicians can not conjure gold out of thin air as they can do with fiat currency.

    Stability – Gold does not burn, rust or decay.

    Demand – Gold is desirable as a luxury item due to its intrinsic properties.

    These features collectively make gold an attractive resource for storing value. A fact supported by thousands of years of human history of people accepting gold as payment. A history that continues today and can be witnessed in an extreme example in the current failed state of Zimbabwe as illustrated in this video:

    “Gold for Bread”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ubJp6rmUYM

  10. Sean, thanks for your comments. There are reasons the founding fathers instituted Gold and Silver Coin as Tender in Payment in the Constitution. They knew all too well the perils associated with paper money.